Treasury Clashes With USPS on Military Pensions

Share this article:
The Treasury Department recommended in a report issued Sept. 30 that the U.S. Postal Service pay the estimated $27 billion its employees who are military veterans are scheduled to receive for military service when they retire.


The recommendation conflicts with that of the USPS, which argues that it should be relieved of responsibility for employee military service benefits and that it is the only federal agency tasked with bearing this cost. Postal officials have said that if Congress relieves the USPS of this responsibility, it would have an extra $10 billion to address the growing costs of retiree health benefits.


However, in its report the Treasury Department argued that the USPS should fund all its expenses through postal rates. Though other agencies don't have to pay for military service benefits, the cost ultimately is borne by the taxpayer whether the expense is charged to the Treasury Department or to the individual agencies, the department said.


Postal employees receive credit for the military service toward their pensions under the Civil Service Retirement System, so it would be fair to make the USPS pay the military benefits of all employees hired after June 30, 1971, when the postal service became independent, the Treasury Department recommended.


Share this article:

Sign up to our newsletters

Follow us on Twitter @dmnews

Latest Jobs:

More in Direct Mail

Delivered: University of Chicago Mailers

Delivered: University of Chicago Mailers

What's in our mailbox this month: University of Chicago mailers. See which ones make the grade—and which ones, not so much.

Ricoh Strikes a Blow for Multichannel on a Small Scale

Ricoh Strikes a Blow for Multichannel on a ...

The company introduces a creative service to help print shops augment direct mail with email and pURL landing pages.

Delivered: Insurance Mailers

Delivered: Insurance Mailers

What's in our mailbox this month: Insurance mailers. See which ones cover all their bases—and which ones, not so much.