Of ads, newspapers, and Google

Share this article:
I came across something interesting, ironically enough, while perusing RSS feeds today. It was a story from CNET that was billed as such:

Report: Only 3 percent of newspaper reading is done online
A fascinating, involving, and, naturally, complex piece from Harvard's Nieman Journalism Lab suggests that little news reading happens online. That suggests advertisers have simply given up on print newspapers


Of course, I found the number absurdly low, and checked in with the article to see what it had to say. Essentially, it said exactly what its tease in the RSS feed said: A Harvard group had published a report that said that only 3% of newspaper reading was done online, and the author conjectured that if this was true, why, it was simply an overcorrection on the part of advertisers to take their ads out of print and focus on other channels.

Given the recent discussion between Google's Eric Schmidt and struggling publishers over whether the placement of ads in Google News results amounts to profiting from others' work, and the very real revenue losses, job cuts and circulation issues among daily newspapers, this revelation is of interest to a number of stakeholders in print advertising.

Of course, knowing full well that in this world there are lies, damned lies, and statistics, marketers are likely to take these findings with a grain of salt. There's little to suggest that a significant amount of content consumption — whether news or entertainment — is done anywhere but the Web. In fact, here at DMNews, we've see record traffic to our Web site this year. So there's plenty of other studies and statistics that rationalize marketers' shift to digital marketing.

But the consumption model still is evolving. Some would say that the most effective form of online marketing isn't simple display ads, but nuanced viral campaigns. In fact, these kinds of campaigns have become so popular among big brands that the FTC is reviewing them. So maybe there's a point for print publications to make that for straight display, nothing beats print. I can't say this for sure, because I don't have the numbers in front of me. But rather than portraying themselves as casting a wide net, publications should look at their demographic base and offer an analogue to what marketers find online: razor-sharp targeting ensuring that ads served or displayed are relevant to readers.
Share this article:
You must be a registered member of Direct Marketing News to post a comment.
close

Next Article in Direct Line Blog

Sign up to our newsletters

Latest Jobs:


Company of the week

Data Services, Inc. meets the needs of today's data-driven marketer by providing front-end database management and data analytics platforms alongside our expertise in global contact data quality, database building and ongoing maintenance that comes with our 45+ years in business.


Find out more here »

More in Direct Line Blog

Creative Marketing Is Good; Useful, Relevant Messages Are Better

Creative Marketing Is Good; Useful, Relevant Messages Are ...

The next wave of the digital evolution is pushing marketers toward hyper-relevance; but not everyone is catching on.

What (Truly) Matters to Millennials

What (Truly) Matters to Millennials

A recent study reveals the things that millennials really care about—and what moves them to make a purchase.

The Long, Hard Road to Marketing Sophistication

The Long, Hard Road to Marketing Sophistication

If there are times when you feel like you're way behind on the customer journey, well, you probably are. But so is nearly everyone else.