wins in pop-up suit

Utah's state Supreme Court held ruled in favor of in a lawsuit brought against it by

The court ruled that insertion of unwanted competitive pop-up advertisements does not constitute unfair competition or tortious interference. sued its competitor, SmartBargains, alleging violations of the State's anti-spyware statute related to unfair competition and tortious interference with prospective business relations.

Overstock accused SmartBargains of causing SmartBargains pop-up ads to appear when an Internet user visited

The trial court granted summary judgment for SmartBargains. The court held that the anti-spyware statute was unconstitutional and found that Overstock had not presented a genuine issue of material fact on its unfair competition and tortious interference claims. On appeal, the Utah Supreme Court affirmed the grant of summary judgment.

You must be a registered member of Direct Marketing News to post a comment.

Next Article in Multichannel Marketing

Sign up to our newsletters

Follow us on Twitter @dmnews

Latest Jobs:

Featured Listings



OneTouchPoint is a single source provider of strategic, integrated and multi-channel direct marketing ...