**MAPS Blackholes 24/7 Exactis

Share this article:
Anti-spam group Mail Abuse Prevention System LLC yesterday listed approximately 150 mail servers belonging to 24/7 Exactis, a subsidiary of 24/7 Media, on its Realtime Blackhole List, its controversial compilation of alleged spammers. In an immediate response, 24/7 Exactis went to U.S. Federal District Court in Denver and filed a request for a temporary restraining order.


Yesterday's actions resume a battle between MAPS and 24/7 Exactis that began earlier this year and was thought to have been settled last May when 24/7 Exactis assured MAPS that its would implement fully verified opt-in list management practices for all of its e-mail lists as well as those of its clients. (Verified opt-in refers to the practice of first asking consumers for permission to send commercial e-mail and then requiring the consumers to respond to a verification of the permission.)


MAPS, Redwood City, CA, said its decision to place 24/7 Exactis on the RBL occurred after Exactis repudiated a previously negotiated agreement. 24/7 Exactis' argument then and now is that its e-mail clients - and not 24/7 Exactis - are responsible for establishing permission with the e-mail recipients.


The two parties were scheduled to present their cases before the court today.
Share this article:
close

Next Article in Digital Marketing

Follow us on Twitter @dmnews

Latest Jobs:

Featured Listings

More in Digital Marketing

Good Descriptions Rate More Than Good Reviews

Good Descriptions Rate More Than Good Reviews

Price still rules as an online purchase influencer, says a new survey, but basic brand assets should not be ignored in online product presentations.

For CMOs, A Tale of Two Situations

For CMOs, A Tale of Two Situations

A survey of 525 chief marketers finds them voyaging between digital discovery and digital deliverance, riding out turbulent trends to positions of newfound respect.

Is Native Advertising an Evolution or a Mutation?

Is Native Advertising an Evolution or a Mutation?

Was there truth to John Oliver's rant or was the comedic host unfair in his admonishments?