Letter: Why Has the Press Focused on Privacy With Google Subpoena?

Share this article:
Bob Gellman's article ("Google and the Federal Subpoena," April 3) is interesting and has some points I agree with. However, I am disappointed that the press has picked up completely on the issues of privacy in this all and treated the point of the government's request as a minor side point.

The government is trying to crack down on child pornography!

There are predators who now have access to our living rooms! This is a new world and has new problems.

I know what you will say ...

"It's the parent's fault. Don't let children go online unsupervised."

As a parent, I don't want to restrict access to this most valuable source of information so child predators and pornographers can run free.

There are armies of patent attorneys protecting company trademarks. They are solving that problem. Privacy hasn't mattered on that issue.

Privacy becomes a big deal though, when it involves pornography online. I guess there are too many important business interests affected.

I personally have switched from Google to Yahoo as my home page. I see their willingness to help as a good trait.

Joe Martinico, Americans for Separating Adult Content

joe@afsac.org

Share this article:
close

Next Article in Opinions

Sign up to our newsletters

Follow us on Twitter @dmnews

Latest Jobs:

More in Opinions

The One-to-One Future Is Now

The One-to-One Future Is Now

Editor-in-Chief Ginger Conlon offers her take on what it means to make an impact on the marketing industry.

Leading by (Poor) Example: Answers

Leading by (Poor) Example: Answers

The VP of marketing has been a little lax in his definition of the term "business expense" and it shows. See how our readers would handle this thorny situation.

Attention Marketing Consultants: Protect Yourselves

Attention Marketing Consultants: Protect Yourselves

A lot can go wrong when you're a marketing consultant—but there are plenty of ways to safeguard yourself if you're smart about it.