'Junk' mail label broadens, says Return Path

Share this article:
'Junk' mail label broadens, says Return Path
'Junk' mail label broadens, says Return Path

Finding that 56.4% of consumers say they receive high volumes of junk e-mail from marketers, when junk is defined as “e-mail from companies I know but that is just not interesting to me," e-mail service provider Return Path has put the onus on the retailer.

The study, titled “Email Connections Are Down, but Opportunity to Build Relationships and Increase Sales is Up,” found that many retailers did not take advantage of the e-mail channel as best they could have this holiday season.

Marketers looking to gain a consumer's attention should focus on segmenting based on a consumer's behavior and demographics and send more relevant marketing messages.

Fifty-eight percent of respondents say they determine the value of each e-mail message based on the subject line.

The subject line and from line, as well as a consistent schedule of mailing may help boost response, as 52.3% of respondents delete messages they don't recognize and 29.1% feel they come too frequently.

Slightly less than a third of subscribers say they only open messages from brands they know. However, another 14.4% said that regardless of brand, they only open the e-mail if they requested the particular message type.

Share this article:

Sign up to our newsletters

Follow us on Twitter @dmnews

Latest Jobs:

More in Email Marketing

To Send or Not to Send More Email: That Is the Question

To Send or Not to Send More Email: ...

"It's not a matter of 'one email a day is fine, but two emails a day is too much.'"

Forrester: Keep Your Eye on the Email

Forrester: Keep Your Eye on the Email

Merging email with other channels is all well and good, but a Forrester Wave analysis holds that the email channel itself could stand improvement.

Email Opens Have Increased While Clicks Remain Static

Email Opens Have Increased While Clicks Remain Static

Open rates rose to 32.9% in Q1 2014, but clicks haven't changed for the past couple of years, a study says. But why?