Is Appending Too Good to Be True?

Share this article:
So you want to collect your customers' e-mail addresses, quickly and without spending a fortune. And you don't have the staff to manage it. You've read that the Association of Interactive Marketing released e-mail appending guidelines. Is this the answer or just another dot-com pipe dream?


Here's how appending works: A service bureau overlays your customer file against a compiled file of opted-in e-mail addresses. All matched people receive an e-mail explaining that they will receive e-mails from your company unless they opt out.


E-mail appending sounds like a great solution. You pay only per e-mail match. You can get it done quickly, usually through your service bureau. Often there are no upfront expenses or risks. And it takes about as much work as a merge/purge.


But it's not that simple. I know of half a dozen companies that tested appending. Not one rolled out or even retested.


The following may help you understand appending, including the controversy that surrounds it:


Direct response 101. Given a choice, would you mail a compiled list or a buyers list? The same rationale applies to collecting e-mail addresses. Actively provided e-mail addresses are far more responsive than passively compiled ones. We found that a non-customer who opts in to receive a newsletter or third-party information from you is twice as likely to become your customer than a non-customer who doesn't opt in. The more actively a person participates in the e-mail collection process, the more responsive you can expect them to be.


Is anybody home? How do you evaluate the accuracy of the appended file? It's not as clear-cut as it seems.


Studies indicate that 30 percent of Internet users have multiple e-mail accounts. Are you getting the primary e-mail address or a seldom- or never-used address? Does the appended record match the exact name and exact address? What if a household has more than one person with the same name? What if you only have a first initial on your customer file or the name or address is misspelled? What if your customer address is a work address? What if your customer is an adult and the e-mail address is for a child?


The reality is that service providers, who charge per e-mail address, will never have a match logic that is as rigorous as you would like.


Appending gives you quantity of your customers' e-mail addresses quickly. But without quality, how much value does it offer even if you're only paying pennies a name?


Hotline names on steroids. E-mail addresses age quickly. Studies indicate that 3 percent of all e-mail addresses change each month. If you're matching your customer file against a list where the average name is a year old, up to 36 percent of the e-mail addresses you match are likely out of date.


Opting in versus not opting out. When a service bureau appends your file with e-mail addresses, it sends an e-mail to all matches. The e-mail does not ask the matched people whether they want e-mail communications from you, only whether they don't. Let's say you're on the matched list and you get the e-mail from the service bureau. If you don't respond, does that mean you want e-mails from the company? Or that you didn't open your e-mail? Or that you're afraid this unknown e-mail contains a virus? Or that you use this address for junk e-mail and you never look at it?


Buyer beware. It's hard for traditional direct marketers to appreciate the sensitivity of online privacy. After all, you don't need permission to mail a direct mail package.


The online environment is different. Accidentally send an e-mail to someone who has not opted in and you'll get a shockingly irate, and often expletive-filled, response. You could get bad press. It could hurt your brand image. If you do test overlaying your file, have the opt-out e-mails come directly to your e-mail address. Then you can see firsthand how people are responding.


If that's not traumatic enough, consider this: passively acquired e-mail addresses respond at significantly lower rates. Think about the last time you opened an e-mail from an unknown sender. You probably asked yourself either "How did they get my e-mail address?" or "Will I get a virus if I open this?" By focusing on the e-mail instead of the proposition, you start off in a less responsive state.


Throwing the baby out with the bath water. Let's say you perform an e-mail append and the file proves less responsive than expected. Does that mean appending is a poor way to collect e-mail addresses? Or does it mean your customers are unresponsive to e-mail marketing? The worst thing you can do is abandon e-mail marketing because you selected the wrong way to collect addresses.


When appending makes sense. Despite its flaws, overlaying your file with e-mail addresses can play a role in the e-mail collection mix. It just shouldn't be the primary means for collecting your customers' e-mail addresses. Here are two instances in which appending could be very effective:


Expires or non-active customers. Since you probably don't promote to former customers that often, you don't have a vehicle for requesting e-mail addresses. Overlaying the inactive file provides a cost-effective way to reach and hopefully reactivate former customers. In this case, appending is more cost-effective than direct mail for collecting e-mail addresses. But further testing is needed to determine whether e-mail is better than direct mail for reactivating customers.


Once you've collected a critical mass of e-mail addresses. Even with a concerted effort, you will not collect 100 percent of your customers' e-mail addresses. At that point, consider appending for those who did not respond to your primary efforts.


Why? First, you are unlikely to get their e-mail through active efforts. Second, a passive e-mail address is better than no e-mail address. Finally, the incremental cost of e-mailing these people is minimal once you have a critical mass of active addresses.


One word of caution: evaluate the appended names separately from actively collected names, or you may skew your results.


Intuitively, e-mail appending makes sense - much like, intuitively, mailing to compiled lists makes sense. It's cheap. It's easy. Unfortunately, it's not the best way to collect responsive e-mail addresses. For some, where the value of an e-mail address is minimal, appending may be cost-effective. More than likely, appending will prove once again the adage: "If it seems too good to be true, it probably is!"


Share this article:
close

Next Article in Digital Marketing

Follow us on Twitter @dmnews

Latest Jobs:

Featured Listings

More in Digital Marketing

Microsoft Set to Overtake Yahoo in Ad Revenues

Microsoft Set to Overtake Yahoo in Ad Revenues

Marissa Mayer can take credit for reversing ad declines. Still, her company will fall out of digital's Top 3 by year's end, according to eMarketer.

Oracle Announces Enhancements to its Marketing Cloud

Oracle Announces Enhancements to its Marketing Cloud

It continues to integrate functionalities from BlueKai, Responsys, and Eloqua.

In the Age of Storytelling, Is the CTA Still Viable?

In the Age of Storytelling, Is the CTA ...

Marketers have always put calls-to-action in messaging, but research suggests that sequenced ads may be more effective.