Internet Retailers Settle FTC Charges Over Holiday Shipping Delays

Share this article:
Seven Internet retailers yesterday settled Federal Trade Commission charges that they violated the Mail and Telephone Order Rule during the 1999 holiday shopping season. The FTC had alleged the e-tailers provided buyers with inadequate notice of shipping delays or continued to promise specific delivery dates when timely fulfillment was impossible.

CDNow Inc., LLC, Inc., Franklin W. Bishop dba, The Original Honey Baked Ham Company of Georgia Inc., Patriot Computer Corp. and Inc. have agreed to change their procedures to ensure that such violations will not recur this year and to pay civil penalties totaling $1.5 million.

The settlements are the culmination of Project, an FTC investigation of whether major online retailers delivered goods when promised during the 1999 holiday season.

"Although there are still 151 shopping days until Christmas, today's announcement is an early gift for Internet shoppers," Jodie Bernstein, director at the FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection, said yesterday. "Last December, a large number of e-commerce buyers didn't get the type of notice of late shipment which the law requires and were misled about delivery dates."

Bernstein added yesterday that "the requirements of the rule apply to online and offline commerce equally; today's settlement shows the FTC takes violations of the rule by e-tailers seriously, and will expect e-tailers either to comply with the law or face stiff penalties."

Last December, the FTC received complaints from sources indicating that prominent e-tailers repeatedly failed to meet their express shipping and delivery representations.

Based on this information, FTC staff began an investigation of e-tailers, focusing on major online companies that were making express delivery claims, to examine whether these failures were violations of the rule.

The rule requires that retailers ship goods within the date promised, or if no date is promised, within 30 days of the order's receipt. If the company cannot ship as promised, it is required to provide notice to the buyer with a revised shipping date, giving the buyer the opportunity to agree to the delay or to cancel the order.

The investigation revealed that some e-tailers violated the rule by failing to send the required Delay Option Notice, sending notices that were deficient and, in some cases, making shipping representations without a reasonable basis.
Share this article:
You must be a registered member of Direct Marketing News to post a comment.

Next Article in Digital Marketing

Follow us on Twitter @dmnews

Latest Jobs:

Featured Listings

More in Digital Marketing

Customer Identity in the Digital Age

Customer Identity in the Digital Age

Industry experts explore the value in a person's cyber identity for marketers.

Epsilon Rebrands as End-to-End Marketing Solution

Epsilon Rebrands as End-to-End Marketing Solution

The goal is to flame the perception that technology and creativity live under one roof at the company, says President Andy Frawley.

Mobile Spend Vaults 76 Percent in First Half, IAB Reports

Mobile Spend Vaults 76 Percent in First Half, ...

Overall Internet ad revenues escalate by 15% to $23 billion, also fueled by increased activity in social media and video.