IM Versus Search: Battle For Brand Effectiveness
Google indexes more Web pages than there are people on Earth. Blogging, RSS and podcasting promote a world of publishing where authors outnumber readers, viewers or listeners. The Internet free-for-all is a double-edged sword: dis-aggregation gives freedom to individuals and offers new possibilities in targeted marketing but makes media marketing planning and campaigning more challenging.
The overarching rallying cry as we close out WWWI - the first wave of the World Wide Web - is search. From the early ISP portals - remember Netcom? - to Yahoo, AltaVista, Excite, Ask Jeeves and Google, search has become the Internet consumer aggregation point. Even eBay doubles as a fantastic vertical search mechanism. Search has a sort of lifeboat identity among marketers, the great hope for order out of chaos. Search will solve our aggregation and media buying problems. Vertical search will solve our targeting problems.
Search is a powerful aggregation and contextual linking tool and will continue to offer great value to marketers as digital networks mature. Still, we should be careful not to view search as a panacea. Though it is great for intercepting consumers with purchase interest and driving them to further evaluation, search isn't very sticky; consumers don't tend to hang out on search sites.
This, combined with the inherent goal orientation of search, may limit how many and what types of messages can be put alongside or in the way of search without creating consumer frustration and resentment.
Additionally, search is typically a solitary pursuit. It's difficult to replicate the experience of window shopping with a friend and sharing enthusiasm for a product or service, where purchase intent can be converted naturally into purchases. Finally, the old saw about only 20 percent of the population being active information seekers probably holds up on the Internet as everywhere else. So is there an Internet marketing plan for the searchless?
Not surprisingly, marketers are experimenting with alternative aggregation points. One of the most promising is instant messaging. Instant messaging's credentials are strong. More than 100 million IM accounts are active in the United States, and IM has replaced e-mail as the standard communication mode for younger consumers. Moreover, IM has compelling characteristics beyond raw reach:
• IM is sticky. It is always on and present even if the user is doing other things. And core IM users - kids through early 20s - spend a lot of time daily with IM, more than 60 minutes of active messaging.
• IM is behavioral. Because it builds on user profiles, IM can provide convenient filtering and presentation of information and media for all users - important for those who use search occasionally or infrequently. IM offers high measurability because it can accrete opt-in user profile and behavior information.
• IM is real time, real life - a channel that lets brands reach potential customers in the act of sharing interests and recommendations, when emotions are engaged in purchase intent. IM's opportune message delivery recalls TV's halcyon days when the family gathered 'round the set to watch favorite shows, or the magic of a window-shopping stroll.
• IM is personal, offering a win-win for brand marketers and IM users by encouraging user identification. Skins, emoticons and sounds are just the start. Personalized elements can carry messages and cues while letting users say who they are to their friends.
IM brings people together to share interests, positioning it as a platform for interest-based communities, which are natural aggregation and targeting points for brand marketers. Professional marketing not only is tolerated but welcomed in communities where it is seen as a legitimate member and sponsor. IM offers a win-win environment for brands aligned with their interests. This ought to give marketers something they can tune into as well.