Another Class-Action Lawsuit for Inc.

Another class-action lawsuit has been filed against online stamps company Inc. and its current and former officers, directors and underwriters.

The lawsuit, filed Wednesday by New York-based law firm Stull, Stull & Brody, was the fifth in two weeks related to's June 25, 1999, initial public offering.

The latest lawsuit was filed in federal court in New York on behalf of purchasers of common stock between June 25, 1999, and May 16, 2001.

Like the other lawsuits, the complaint alleges that, Santa Monica, CA, and its officers and directors violated the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The suit claims that the company sold common stock in an IPO and a secondary offering without disclosing to investors that at least one of the lead underwriters in the IPO had solicited and received excessive and undisclosed commissions from certain investors.

The lawsuit also charges that in exchange for the commissions, lead underwriter BancBoston allocated shares to customers at the IPO price of $11 per share. To receive such allocations at $11, BancBoston's brokerage customers had to agree to buy additional shares in the aftermarket at higher prices. This artificial price inflation, the complaint alleges, allowed both BancBoston and its customers to reap profits by buying stock at the $11 IPO price, then selling it later for a profit at inflated aftermarket prices, which rose as high as $45.81 during its first day of trading.

The lawsuit also charges that was able to price the secondary offering of stock at an artificially high price of $65 per share because of the continued effects of the alleged violations.

The plaintiffs seek to recover unspecified damages on behalf of all those who purchased or otherwise acquired securities during the period in question.

You must be a registered member of Direct Marketing News to post a comment.

Next Article in Direct Mail

Sign up to our newsletters

Follow us on Twitter @dmnews

Latest Jobs: