GM gives Zuck a slap in the Facebook

GM's Facebook cover ... not much else to say about that.
GM's Facebook cover ... not much else to say about that.

The Wall Street Journal broke the story at 2:52 pm on Tuesday, May 15 with a tweet: “GM to stop buying ads on Facebook, sees them as ineffective.” Dare I say, the tweet heard round the world. It was actually only a rumor at that point (General Motors didn't confirm until several hours later), but the news caught fire immediately, as of course it would.

GM — the third biggest advertiser in the U.S., behind P&G and AT&T  — isn't going to stop marketing on Facebook. It's just going to stop paying Facebook for the privilege of doing so. The automaker still plans to maintain its page, where it has more than 378,000 “likes.” That, of course, is free. Well, free for regular people, not marketing behemoths. According to the Journal, GM expends about $30 million a year on agencies to develop its Facebook content and on staff to maintain the page.

Joel Ewanick, GM's head of marketing, proffered this rather bland statement to the press regarding the company's decision: GM is “definitely reassessing our advertising on Facebook, although content is effective and important.”

What GM spent on Facebook ads — just $10 million — was only a tiny fraction of its total marketing budget. Considering Kantar Media estimates the company dropped $1.8 billion on advertising in 2011, that's about as noticeable as a fly on an elephant's rear.

What this means for Facebook's long-awaited, highly anticipated, much-discussed and extensively pondered upcoming IPO is on the mind of every blogger, analyst, journalist, marketer and investor from here to, say, China — the only country in the world other than India whose population is still higher than the number of Facebook users: over 900 million.

However a marketer feels about the usefulness of Facebook ads, it's unwise to ignore a website that has more active users than almost triple the population of the United States. But Facebook doesn't hold all the power. If other large advertisers decide to chuck FB ads, Facebook could be cooked, as the Friending Facebook blog on ZDNet rightly points out.

How often do Facebook users really click on those ads in the right-hand column? One of my coworkers told me she was able to track down a service she was looking for through a Facebook ad, so for her it worked like a charm. But 57% of users polled by AP/CNBC in a recent survey said they never click on paid ads or sponsored content when they're on Facebook. [CNBC posted the results of the poll on Facebook. Both meta and cheeky.]

For a company like Facebook — the Journal says the majority of Facebook's $3.7 billion annual revenue comes from sales — that is certainly unpleasant news.

As for me, the effectiveness of Facebook ads is zero. I've never clicked on a single one.

 
Allison Schiff
is web editor at
Direct Marketing News.

(Zuckerberg image credit: zipmeme.com/)

You must be a registered member of Direct Marketing News to post a comment.

Sign up to our newsletters

Latest Jobs:


Company of the Week


SK&A is a leading provider of U.S. healthcare information solutions and databases. As part of IMS Health, SK&A researches and maintains contact and profiling data for over 2 million healthcare providers, including 800,000+ prescribers. SK&A's data supports research and marketing initiatives for life sciences, medical device, managed healthcare, direct marketing, publishing, education and more. SK&A's proprietary databases are telephone-verified twice per year from its world class Research Centers. SK&A enables multi-channel marketing and sets the standard for data quality and reliability. SK&A's customers include many of America's most recognized healthcare, publishing and pharmaceutical institutions.


Featured Listings

SKA

SKA

SK&A is a leading provider of U.S. healthcare information solutions and databases. As ...