Google Lashes Out Against Justice Department Subpoena

Share this content:
Google formally opposed the Justice Department's subpoena Feb. 17 that called on the search giant to hand over search data. In its formal rejection of the subpoena filed with a federal judge in San Jose, CA, Google accused prosecutors of a "cavalier attitude" and said the request violates users' rights to privacy and could lead to the exposure of the company's closely guarded trade secrets.


The response came after the Justice Department asked a judge last month to force Google to hand over a random sample of 1 million Web pages. The Bush administration requested the data to use it to prevent child pornography from being viewed online.


In its brief, Google argued that simply knowing the Web addresses in its index would not let the government determine which contained pornographic material because a Web page's content can change daily. The company also described what it does to protect its algorithms from competitors, including not revealing how many computers it uses to run the search engine, type of users' browsers, number of queries it processes in a day and nature of the search strings users type in.


"Google users trust that when they enter a search query into a Google search box, not only will they receive back the most relevant results, but that Google will keep private whatever information users communicate absent a compelling reason," the company wrote in its brief. "The government's demand for disclosure of untold millions of search queries submitted by Google users and for production of a million Web page addresses or 'URLs' randomly selected from Google's proprietary index would undermine that trust, unnecessarily burden Google and do nothing to further the government's case in the underlying action."


AOL, Microsoft and Yahoo voluntarily complied with similar requests.


The American Civil Liberties Union filed a 10-page brief supporting Google, saying the government's explanation is "too vague" regarding why it needed the searches to justify a court order.


"The government is not entitled to go on a fishing expedition through millions of Google searches anytime it wants just because it claims it needs that information," ACLU staff attorney Aden Fine said in a statement. "Google has rightly denied the government's demand."


The ACLU also said that if the Justice Department wins the release of Google's search data, it will file its own subpoena for Google data to assess the reliability of the random sampling.


A hearing has been set for March 13.


Loading links....
close

Next Article in Digital Marketing

Sign up to our newsletters

Company of the Week

We recently were named B2B Magazine's Direct Marketing Agency of the Year, and with good reason: We make real, measureable, positive change happen for our clients. A full-service agency founded in 1974, Bader Rutter expertly helps you get the right message to the right audience at the right time through the right channels. As we engage our clients' audiences along their journey, direct marketing (email, direct mail, phone, SMS) and behavioral marketing (SEM, retargeting, contextual) channels deliver information relevant to the needs of each stage. We are experts at implementing and leveraging marketing technologies such as CRM and marketing automation in order to synchronize sales and marketing communications. Our team of architects and activators plan, execute, measure and adjust in real time to ensure the strategy is working as needed and change things if it's not.

Find out more here »

DMN's Career Center

Check out hundreds of exciting professional opportunities available on DMN's Career Center.  
Explore careers in digital marketing, sales, eCommerce, marketing communications, IT, data strategies, and much more. And don't forget to update your resume so employers can contact you privately about job opportunities.

>>Click Here