Best Responders Often Are the Highest Spenders

Share this article:
Tim Berry's otherwise excellent article ("Developing an Acquisition Modeling Strategy," April 20) contains a minor technical flaw. He recommends multiplying the predictions from a response model with the predictions from a prospect value model to produce a "combined score" that estimates the expected value of mailing a prospect.


Mathematically, this multiplication assumes the two predictions are independent. However, these predictions may be highly and positively correlated: Prospects most likely to respond are often the prospects most likely to spend the most.


Berry's method can fail to recognize the full value of the better prospects, perhaps scoring them into lower deciles. A simple correction known as the Durbin-McFadden factor can be applied to fix this problem (see Durbin & McFadden, Econometrica, Vol. 52, No. 2).


Applying the fix is almost trivial and could significantly improve results in large mailings. At least two catalogers now use this method at my suggestion.


Alan Rimm-Kaufman, Ph.D.


Director of marketing research


Crutchfield Corp.,


Charlottesville, VA
Share this article:
You must be a registered member of Direct Marketing News to post a comment.
close

Next Article in Data/Analytics

Sign up to our newsletters

Follow us on Twitter @dmnews

Latest Jobs:

Featured Listings

More in Data/Analytics

Big Data's Latest Conquest: Real Estate

Big Data's Latest Conquest: Real Estate

RealtyTrac expands its lead-generation database from 1 million properties to 118 million.

Let the Music Do the Marketing

Let the Music Do the Marketing

Live Nation puts a modern spin on connecting customers and partners.

One Tough Question: Marketing Measurement [Interactive eBook]

One Tough Question: Marketing Measurement [Interactive eBook]

Explore how to get the most from marketing investment in this interactive eBook.