Behavioral targeting

Share this article:
Sheldon Gilbert
Sheldon Gilbert

Proclivity's Sheldon Gilbert discusses the nuances of behavioral targeting


Q: What does the future hold for behavioral targeting now that several marketers have pulled the plug on pro­grams in the face of growing scrutiny from federal regulators?

A: There are really two different kinds of online behavioral targeting. One, which I call site scraping, looks at con­sumer behavior across different Web sites. This is what has been getting all the attention this year because consum­ers have no idea about how the infor­mation is being collected, how it will be used down the line or what the inherent value of collecting this data is. This area may have to be reconstituted. The other area, where Proclivity operates, is permission-based and driven by the need for retailers to better understand how consumers interact with their own brand. This area, predictive shopping behavior analysis, is currently under­served, and one we expect will see a lot of growth in the next few years.

Q: Do you think behavioral targeting has been targeted unfairly by the media and government?

A: Behavioral targeting warrants a certain amount of scrutiny to make sure consumer privacy is not being breached. But behavioral targeting may have become too much of a pejorative lately. Once consumers are educated about how targeting stops marketers from sending them irrelevant messages and start sending them messages that are more relevant, behavioral targeting is no longer threatening. Younger con­sumers, in particular, are less concerned about the extent to which data about them is used by marketers.

Q: What is new in predictive shopping behavior analysis?

A: It is incumbent upon marketers to have more relevant interactions with customers, because those interactions are less obtrusive and more engaging. This changes everything, with less opt-outs, lower customer turnover rates and more loyalty. We are going to see more granular behavioral analysis with propensity to buy and price preference driving the notion of relevancy. Retail­ers also need to integrate search engine marketing behavior into any predictive analysis in order to create a more robust way to acquire new customers. There is massive untapped potential in trying to understand unstructured online behav­ior like blogging and listening to music and trying to make inferences from this to create a richer profile of customers.

Q: Can online shopping behavior be tied to in-store activity?

A: There is an opportunity to tie together the online and offline world with predictive shopping behavior analysis. This would help retailers understand the economic impact of tar­geting a customer in a store vs. online. We could identify, for example, that a customer is in the exploratory stage online and is just about to convert to an in-store sale. The question for the marketer then becomes, “How do you close the loop? Do you send an e-mail, a piece of direct mail or use some other means?”

Share this article:
close

Next Article in Digital Marketing

Follow us on Twitter @dmnews

Latest Jobs:

Featured Listings

More in Digital Marketing

News Byte: CX Scores to Take Their Place Beside Price Listings

News Byte: CX Scores to Take Their Place ...

E-commerce aggregator PriceGrabber will begin offsetting price info with service expectations.

Data Byte: Interactive Ad Revenues Exceeding TV for the First Time

Data Byte: Interactive Ad Revenues Exceeding TV for ...

At nearly $43 billion, interactive advertising revenues exceeded broadcast for the first time in 2013.

Marketers: Data Rich and Knowledge Poor

Marketers: Data Rich and Knowledge Poor

While advertisers have become incredibly data-savvy, the most difficult challenge remains causally linking that data to outcomes that really matter.